# Aperture vs MetaView

MetaView auto-generates notes and scorecards from the human interviews your team already runs. Aperture runs the screening interview itself and returns a scored, ranked shortlist before your team spends a minute. MetaView cleans up the interviews you do. Aperture removes the interviews you shouldn't be doing.

## Pick MetaView if

- your bottleneck is writing notes and filling scorecards, not running interviews.
- you don't want to change how your team interviews, just capture it better.

## Pick Aperture if

- your bottleneck is volume: too many applicants to screen manually.
- you want the AI to run the interview, not just transcribe someone else's.
- you want a ranked shortlist, not a pile of auto-generated notes.

## How Aperture Compares to MetaView

| Feature                                               | Aperture                                           | MetaView                                          |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
| AI behavioral interviews                               | 15-minute adaptive, probes deeper based on answers | -                                                |
| AI notetaking on human interviews                      | -                                                | -                                                |
| Scoring model                                         | [λ-core scoring with confidence intervals across 6 dimensions](/content/lambda-core/index.html) | -                                                |
| Auto-generated scorecards                             | -                                                | -                                                |
| Confidence intervals on scores                        | yes                                              | no                                               |
| Pool-relative ranking                                 | yes                                              | no                                               |
| Built-in applicant tracking system                    | yes                                              | no                                               |
| ATS integrations                                      | [LinkedIn, Greenhouse, Ashby, Lever, Indeed](/content/product/index.html) | yes                                              |
| Pricing model                                        | [plan-based, never per-interview](/content/pricing/index.html) | contact sales                                    |
| Free tier                                            | yes                                              | no                                               |
| Candidate data never sold                             | yes                                              | check provider policy                             |

Comparison based on publicly available information as of May 2026. Verify details directly on [MetaView](https://metaview.ai/).

## Common Questions

**Does Aperture replace MetaView?**  
They complement each other. Aperture removes the need for first-round human screens. MetaView improves the deeper human interviews that remain.

**Should I add notes to existing interviews or cut them?**  
Depends on volume. If you get 50 applicants per role, better notes work. If you get 500, you need the first round run by AI.

## Aperture vs Other Platforms

- [Aperture vs HeyMilo](/content/compare/heymilo/index.html) - Voice-first AI screening for high-volume hiring.
- [Aperture vs Chakra](/content/compare/chakra/index.html) - Structured voice interviews for technical screens.
- [Aperture vs BrightHire](/content/compare/brighthire/index.html) - Records the interviews your team already runs.
- [Aperture vs HireVue](/content/compare/hirevue/index.html) - The legacy incumbent in async video.

## Hire for What Actually Matters

Stop filtering on keywords. Start evaluating behavior, depth, and real capability.