aperture vs willo
willo is a clean, simple one-way video tool aimed at small teams and fast setup. aperture offers a similarly fast setup and adds adaptive conversational interviews plus λ-core scoring so you get signal, not just videos. willo is a recording tool. aperture is a decision tool.
pick willo if
- you have a small team, low volume, and want the simplest possible async video tool.
- you're fine reviewing every video manually.
pick aperture if
- you want scoring and ranking, not a pile of videos to review.
- you want adaptive conversations, not scripted prompts.
- you want an ats included so you don't need a second tool.
how aperture compares to willo.
| feature | aperture | willo |
|---|---|---|
| ai behavioral interviews | 15-minute adaptive, probes deeper based on answers | scripted async video prompts |
| scoring model | λ-core scoring with confidence intervals across 6 dimensions | manual review |
| confidence intervals on scores | yes | no |
| pool-relative ranking | yes | no |
| built-in applicant tracking system | yes | no |
| ats integrations | linkedin, greenhouse, ashby, lever, indeed | yes |
| pricing model | plan-based, never per-interview | contact sales |
| free tier | yes | no |
| candidate data never sold | yes | check provider policy |
comparison based on publicly available information as of May 2026. verify details directly on willo.
common questions.
is aperture more than willo?
yes. willo records videos. aperture runs adaptive interviews, scores candidates with confidence intervals, and manages the pipeline end to end.
what's the cost difference?
aperture pricing is plan-based with a free tier. willo is also accessibly priced. the real difference is what you get for the money: recordings vs scored shortlists.
hire for what actually matters.
stop filtering on keywords. start evaluating behavior, depth, and real capability.